top of page

Christian Nationalism and the Ecclesia: The Authority to Advocate and the Power of Persuasion

Christian nationalism is a political ideology that combines Christianity with nationalist beliefs, often asserting that Christianity should play a central role in shaping governmental policies and cultural identity. It is a multifaceted phenomenon that intertwines religious beliefs with a sense of national identity and purpose. While it can inspire a deep sense of belonging and purpose among adherents, it also raises significant concerns about inclusivity, pluralism, and the separation of church and state. 

I appreciate an article written by Patrick Schreiner for the Gospel Coalition. Patrick is a professor at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. He wrote, 

“Christ’s kingdom is to be advocated by persuasion, not power. Conversion must be a free choice, not instituted by command—compelled by the Spirit rather than instituted by human law. According to John in Revelation, Christians follow Christ in His victory primarily by witnessing to the reign of Christ, not by enacting laws. We follow a politic of persuasion all the way down. Revelation 12:11 says we conquer by the ‘word of [our] testimony.’ We imitate Christ’s victory through suffering. This is our main political witness. We conquer not by fighting the political war but by embodying Jesus’s cross-shaped victory. His blood declares Him the King of the universe, and our blood speaks to our solidarity with him. We continue to speak of and demonstrate Jesus’s cross in our own lives and so remain faithful in a pagan society.”

I couldn’t have said it any better although I will try my best. To better understand the impact of Christian nationalism on individuals and societies, I think it necessary to honestly evaluate the advantages and the disadvantages of such an ideology. Let’s begin with …

The Impact of Christian Nationalism

Cultural Solidarity: In the modern landscape of socio-political discourse, the concept of cultural Solidarity has become increasingly pertinent. It represents the intricate web of shared values, traditions, and beliefs that bind communities together, fostering a sense of unity and cohesion.

Christian nationalism, at its core, advocates for the fusion of Christian beliefs with national identity and governance. It emphasizes the importance of preserving a society grounded in Christian values and principles, often invoking historical narratives and symbols to reinforce its ideology. While proponents argue that it serves as a unifying force, critics raise concerns about its potential to marginalize religious and cultural minorities, exacerbate divisions, and undermine pluralism.

At first glance, the relationship between Christian nationalism and cultural solidarity may seem straightforward. After all, both concepts are concerned with fostering a sense of unity and belonging within a society. However, delving deeper reveals a more nuanced and complex dynamic.

One of the key ways in which Christian nationalism intersects with cultural solidarity is through the construction of a shared identity. By framing the nation's identity in religious terms, proponents of Christian nationalism seek to create a sense of belonging among adherents, reinforcing the notion of a distinct and cohesive cultural group. This shared identity can serve as a powerful bond, providing individuals with a sense of purpose and community.

Moreover, Christian nationalism often manifests itself in cultural practices and traditions that further contribute to a sense of solidarity. Religious rituals, holidays, and symbols serve as focal points for collective expression and solidarity, reinforcing the shared values and beliefs that underpin the national identity. These cultural markers not only strengthen the bonds within the Christian nationalist community but also serve as points of reference for interactions with the broader society.

However, the relationship between Christian nationalism and cultural solidarity is not without its complexities and challenges. One of the primary concerns is the potential exclusion of those who do not align with the dominant religious and cultural narratives. Critics argue that privileging one religious tradition over others can undermine the inclusivity and diversity that are essential components of a cohesive society. This exclusionary tendency can create rifts within the social fabric, alienating minority groups and fostering distrust and resentment.

Furthermore, the rigid adherence to a particular set of beliefs and values promoted by Christian nationalism can stifle dissent and diversity of thought, hindering genuine dialogue and understanding. In its most extreme forms, it can lead to the demonization of those who deviate from the accepted norms, breeding intolerance and hostility.

Navigating the intricate relationship between Christian nationalism and cultural solidarity requires a delicate balance—one that acknowledges the importance of shared identity and values while upholding the principles of inclusivity and pluralism. It entails recognizing and celebrating the diversity of religious and cultural perspectives within society while fostering mutual respect and understanding.

Ultimately, the extent to which Christian nationalism contributes to cultural solidarity depends on how it is manifested and interpreted within a given context. When approached with sensitivity and openness, it has the potential to strengthen social bonds and foster a sense of unity. However, when wielded in a manner that excludes or marginalizes others, it can undermine the very fabric of cultural solidarity it seeks to uphold.

In the ongoing discourse surrounding cultural solidarity and Christian nationalism, it is essential to engage in nuanced and constructive dialogue that acknowledges the complexities of identity, belief, and community. By doing so, we can strive towards a more inclusive and harmonious society—one that embraces diversity while forging bonds of solidarity across religious and cultural divides.

Moral Framework: Advocates of Christian nationalism argue that grounding political and societal structures in Christian principles can provide a moral framework for decision-making and governance. This can potentially lead to more ethical policies and behaviors.

While controversial and subject to varying interpretations, Christian nationalism offers a distinctive lens through which individuals navigate their moral obligations within the context of their faith and allegiance to their nation.

At its core, Christian nationalism underscores the belief that the values and principles of Christianity are not only compatible with but integral to the foundations of a nation. Rooted in the conviction that the nation's prosperity and moral fiber are intertwined with adherence to Christian teachings, proponents of this ideology advocate for the active promotion of religious values within the public sphere. Consequently, they view the maintenance of traditional Christian morals as essential for preserving societal order and stability.

Central to the moral framework inspired by Christian nationalism is the concept of a divinely ordained national identity and destiny. Adherents often perceive their nation as uniquely chosen or favored by God, imbuing their collective endeavors with a sense of divine purpose. This perception fosters a deep sense of responsibility among citizens to uphold moral standards consistent with Christian teachings, as they believe their nation's prosperity hinges upon its adherence to these principles. In this view, moral integrity becomes not only a personal obligation but a communal endeavor, with each individual contributing to the collective moral fabric of society.

However, the application of Christian nationalism as a moral framework is not without its challenges and controversies. Critics argue that it can lead to exclusionary practices, fostering an "us versus them" mentality that marginalizes religious and cultural minorities. Moreover, the alignment of religious beliefs with national identity may breed intolerance towards dissenting perspectives and hinder the pursuit of pluralism and inclusivity within society.

In navigating these complexities, adherents of Christian nationalism are called upon to strike a delicate balance between fidelity to their faith and allegiance to their nation. This entails a continual process of introspection and discernment, where individuals critically examine the implications of their beliefs and actions on both personal and societal levels. It also requires a willingness to engage in dialogue and debate with those holding differing perspectives, fostering mutual understanding and respect amidst ideological differences.

Ultimately, the moral framework inspired by Christian nationalism challenges individuals to reconcile their spiritual convictions with their civic duties, forging a path towards a more virtuous and cohesive society. By upholding the principles of love, justice, and compassion inherent in Christian teachings, while simultaneously embracing the diversity and pluralism inherent in modern nations, adherents can strive towards a moral vision that transcends boundaries of faith and nationality.

Historical Continuity: In nations with Christian roots, Christian nationalism can be seen as a way to uphold and honor the historical and cultural heritage of the country. It may provide a sense of continuity with past generations and traditions.

The evolution of Christian nationalism is a fascinating journey through time, marked by shifts in power, interpretation, and cultural context. Understanding this historical continuity provides insights into contemporary debates and challenges surrounding the intersection of faith and politics. While its manifestations vary across time and place, certain historical moments stand out as crucial in tracing its development.

The roots of Christian nationalism can be found in the fusion of Christianity with the Roman Empire in the 4th century CE. Emperor Constantine's conversion to Christianity and the subsequent establishment of Christianity as the state religion laid the groundwork for a powerful symbiotic relationship between church and state. The idea of a "Christian empire" became entrenched, with religious and political authority intertwined.

This fusion persisted through the Middle Ages, as the Roman Catholic Church wielded immense influence over European affairs. The concept of Christendom, the idea of a unified Christian civilization, served as a unifying force amidst the fragmented political landscape of medieval Europe. Crusades, waged in the name of defending Christendom, exemplified the fusion of religious zeal and nationalistic fervor.

The Reformation of the 16th century brought seismic shifts to the landscape of Christian nationalism. The fragmentation of Western Christianity into Catholic and Protestant factions not only reshaped theological doctrine but also redefined the boundaries of national identity. Protestant reformers, particularly in regions like England and Germany, sought to assert their national distinctiveness while maintaining a Christian framework.

The rise of nation-states in the wake of the Reformation further complicated the relationship between Christianity and nationalism. In some cases, such as England under Elizabeth I, Protestantism became synonymous with national identity, bolstering sentiments of exceptionalism and divine favor. In other instances, such as the Thirty Years' War, religious divisions fueled nationalist conflicts, illustrating the perilous intertwining of faith and politics.

The Enlightenment of the 18th century ushered in an era of secularism and rationalism, challenging the traditional dominance of religion in public life. However, rather than signaling the demise of Christian nationalism, this period witnessed its adaptation and transformation. In the United States, for example, the concept of "manifest destiny" merged Christian mission with territorial expansion, fueling westward expansion and the subjugation of indigenous peoples.

The 20th century saw Christian nationalism take on new forms in response to the challenges of modernity and globalization. In Europe, movements such as Christian Democracy sought to reconcile Christian values with democratic principles in the aftermath of World War II. In the United States, the Cold War era saw the emergence of a potent blend of Christianity and anti-communism, with religious rhetoric often employed to justify political agendas.

In the contemporary era, Christian nationalism continues to shape political discourse and mobilize constituencies around the world. From the rise of populist leaders espousing Christian values to debates over immigration, human rights, and social justice, the influence of Christian nationalism is palpable. However, its manifestations are diverse and contested, reflecting the complex interplay of religion, culture, and politics in an increasingly interconnected world.

Understanding the historical continuity of Christian nationalism is essential for navigating the complexities of its contemporary expressions. It serves as a reminder that the relationship between religion and nationalism is fluid and contingent upon historical context. By critically examining its evolution, we can better comprehend its enduring appeal and its implications for the future of religious and political life.

Social Stability: Some proponents believe that Christian values promote social stability by emphasizing virtues such as charity, forgiveness, and empathy, which can contribute to a more harmonious society.

At its core, Christian nationalism intertwines faith with patriotism, fostering a collective identity rooted in religious values and a commitment to the nation.

It emphasizes the Judeo-Christian heritage as the bedrock upon which societal norms, laws, and institutions are built. This perspective views the nation not merely as a political entity but as a divine vessel with a specific destiny under God's providence.

Central to Christian nationalism is the preservation of moral order within society. By grounding societal norms in religious teachings, proponents argue for the safeguarding of traditional values such as integrity, family unity, and respect for authority. This emphasis on moral absolutes provides a framework for navigating ethical dilemmas and fostering a sense of accountability among citizens.

Churches serve as not only places of worship but also hubs for social interaction and support networks. Through collective worship and communal activities, bonds are strengthened, and a sense of belonging is cultivated, contributing to social stability.

In times of adversity, Christian nationalism offers solace and resilience. Its emphasis on faith encourages individuals to persevere through trials, finding strength in their spiritual convictions. Moreover, the sense of duty to one's nation compels citizens to address societal challenges collectively, fostering a spirit of unity and collaboration in the face of adversity.

While Christian nationalism provides a unifying framework, it is not without its controversies. Critics argue that its emphasis on a particular religious identity may marginalize those who do not adhere to the dominant faith tradition. However, proponents contend that Christian nationalism, when practiced with inclusivity and respect for religious diversity, can serve as a bridge across ideological divides, fostering dialogue and understanding.

In the pursuit of social stability, Christian nationalism offers a compelling perspective that integrates faith, patriotism, and community. By upholding moral order, fostering solidarity, and addressing societal challenges, it provides a roadmap for navigating the complexities of modern society. 

Ultimately, the principles of Christian nationalism, when practiced with integrity and compassion, have the potential to nurture a society grounded in virtue, resilience, and unity.

The Correlation Between Christian Nationalism and the Ecclesia

The concept of Ecclesia, deeply ingrained in the fabric of ancient Greek society as a symbol of democratic governance, finds an intriguing parallel in the establishment of the Christian Church by Jesus Christ. While originating from vastly different cultural contexts and serving distinct purposes, the similarities between the Greek Ecclesia and the ecclesia (church) founded by Jesus offer profound insights into the nature of community, governance, and spiritual fellowship.

In ancient Greece, the Ecclesia represented the epitome of citizen participation and democratic governance. Originating in Athens during the reforms of Cleisthenes in the late 6th century BCE, the Ecclesia was an assembly of free male citizens who gathered regularly to deliberate on matters of state, pass laws, and make crucial decisions affecting the polis (city-state).

The Athenian Ecclesia was characterized by principles of inclusivity, deliberation, and collective decision-making. Every citizen had the right to address the assembly, propose legislation, and participate in debates, reflecting the foundational ideals of democracy. Despite its limitations and occasional shortcomings, the Ecclesia served as a beacon of democratic governance, inspiring future generations to aspire to similar principles of self-government and civic engagement.

In the New Testament, Jesus Christ is the founder of the Christian Church, which emerged as a spiritual community of believers bound together by faith, love, and fellowship. In Matthew 16:18, Jesus declares, "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

The term "church" in this context is translated from the Greek word "ecclesia," signifying a gathering or assembly of believers called out from the world to form a new community centered on Christ. Just as the Greek Ecclesia convened for deliberation and decision-making, the Christian Church gathered for worship, teaching, fellowship, and the administration of spiritual affairs.

The parallels between the Greek Ecclesia and Jesus' founding of the Church are striking. Both represent assemblies of individuals united by a common purpose, whether political or spiritual. Both emphasize the importance of collective participation, mutual accountability, and shared governance. And just as the Athenian Ecclesia shaped the trajectory of democracy in the ancient world, the Christian Church has left an indelible mark on the course of human history, shaping cultures, societies, and individuals for millennia.

The correlation between the Greek Ecclesia and Jesus' founding of the Church offers a profound opportunity for reflection on the nature of community, governance, and spiritual fellowship. While rooted in different historical contexts and serving different ends, both institutions embody timeless principles of inclusivity, deliberation, and collective action.

As inheritors of both the democratic legacy of ancient Greece and the spiritual heritage of Christianity, we are called to embody these principles in our own lives and communities. Whether in the public square or the sanctuary, the spirit of Ecclesia reminds us of the power of unity, the importance of participation, and the enduring quest for justice, equality, and truth.

So in conclusion, the correlation between the Greek Ecclesia and Jesus' founding of the Church serves as a poignant reminder of the interconnectedness of human history and the enduring quest for meaning, purpose, and community. As we navigate the complexities of our world today, may we draw inspiration from both traditions to forge a path of solidarity, compassion, and hope for generations to come.

Let me once again restate the definition of Christian nationalism. It is a political ideology that merges Christian identity with national identity, often advocating for policies and practices that prioritize the interests of one religious group within the framework of the nation-state. It tends to promote the idea of a Christian nation, viewing Christianity as not only a personal faith but also a guiding force for governance and societal norms. This ideology manifests in various forms, ranging from symbolic gestures to legislative efforts aimed at promoting Christian values in public life.

Contrastingly, the Ecclesia, rooted in the teachings of Jesus Christ, represents a spiritual community bound by principles of love, justice, and compassion. It transcends national boundaries and encompasses believers from diverse cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. At its core, the Ecclesia emphasizes humility, service, and the pursuit of righteousness, calling followers to embody the values of Christ in their interactions with others and engagement with the world.

The relationship between Christian nationalism and the Ecclesia is marked by tensions and contradictions. While proponents of Christian nationalism may argue for the preservation of traditional values and moral principles, critics often point out the inherent dangers of conflating religious identity with political agendas. This fusion can lead to exclusivism, marginalization of religious minorities, and the distortion of Christian teachings for partisan purposes.

Historically, the intertwining of religion and state power has yielded both positive and negative outcomes. In some cases, Christian values have inspired movements for social justice, abolition, and human rights. However, history also bears witness to instances where religious institutions have been co-opted to justify imperialism, colonialism, and oppression. The challenge lies in discerning how to uphold the principles of the Ecclesia while navigating the complexities of political life.

Within this discourse, the role of the Church as a moral voice and prophetic witness is paramount. The Ecclesia is called to speak truth to power, advocating for justice, equality, and the common good. Rather than aligning uncritically with any political ideology, the Church must maintain its prophetic stance, holding both individuals and institutions accountable to the ethical imperatives of the Gospel.

Navigating the relationship between Christian nationalism and the Ecclesia requires a balanced approach that affirms the significance of both faith and civic engagement. While Christians are called to be active participants in the public sphere, their allegiance ultimately lies with God's kingdom rather than any earthly nation. This perspective invites believers to critique nationalist ideologies that prioritize national interests over the universal principles of love and justice.

The relationship between Christian nationalism and the Ecclesia is multifaceted and complex, reflecting broader debates about the intersection of religion and politics. While Christian nationalism may offer a sense of cultural identity and belonging for some, it must be critically examined in light of the teachings of the Ecclesia. As followers of Christ, believers are called to embody values of humility, compassion, and solidarity, transcending national boundaries and working towards the flourishing of all humanity. In this way, the Ecclesia serves as a beacon of hope and reconciliation in a world marked by division and discord.

20 views0 comments


bottom of page